3 ms·
So it's not like you're going to take the F-35 and move it over to another contractor. More likely, you'll just cancel it and start gain. The other aspect is
by bb88 8y ago
So it's not like you're going to take the F-35 and move it over to another contractor. More likely, you'll just cancel it and start gain.
The other aspect is that it's not really the contractor's fault if the exploit was done with a zero-day.
- jessaustin 8y agoWow I really disagree with that. 0-days are a fact of life. If billions of dollars aren't enough to set up a secure supply chain and air gaps, what would be?
- bb88 8y agoYou conflate the way the world is with the world you wish it would be.
- jessaustin 8y agoNo, I wish we didn't spend trillions of dollars on killing machines for no reason. It's pretty difficult to confuse that world with this one. Your magical phrase "zero-day" doesn't "win this argument" for you... You're imagining some Stuxnet-level pyramid of remote BIOS and NIC firmware hacks when we all know this was just a poorly configured firewall. That's why "TOP SECRET" exists, CYA.