I blame the classifiers in this one. The data should have been classified from the start. The key words in the article were: > The officials said the materia

I blame the classifiers in this one. The data should have been classified from the start. The key words in the article were: > The officials said the material, when aggregated, could be considered classified So, the problem is that the material was probably designated as FOUO, but should have been classified as secret. The difference is that FOUO is okay to be left on desks and the like, but confidential and above needs a safe, and document control.