I'm from Australia and therefore didn't have much exposure to Fred Rogers, but, from what I have seen, it seems that it doesn't really matter if the show was pr

I'm from Australia and therefore didn't have much exposure to Fred Rogers, but, from what I have seen, it seems that it doesn't really matter if the show was presented from a Christian viewpoint. As an athiest, I'm happy to see any ethical children's TV, no matter what faith, or lack thereof, the presenter may have. I agree that there is a cultural battle going on (not just in the US) regarding religion and faith, and I agree that most media representation of both sides leans towards the extremes. That's how the media works. I'm glad to say that Mr Rogers was a great example of moderate Christianity, and he represented what I'd like to say was the majority view of Christians around the world (in regards to how we treat people, especially in regards to tolerance). I'd also like to posit that most people, regardless of particular faith, lack of faith, difference of culture etc., would agree with Fred Rogers' general approach to teaching children, and indeed adults. Basically, I'm agreeing with you: People's preconceptions shouldn't be generalised based on faith or culture, but I'm pointing out that Mr Rogers' ministry goal wasn't just a Christian ideal, but is wide-spread across most people on the planet.