3 ms·
If they were actually accepting all applications that meet the criteria, that would make first come first serve more fair, but there are quotas so they have to
by stormbrew 8y ago
If they were actually accepting all applications that meet the criteria, that would make first come first serve more fair, but there are quotas so they have to reject N-1 applications regardless of their application.
Lottery systems are generally considered fairer than first come first serve because they don't advantage people who apply early. Especially in an immigration-related process where circumstances are likely to dictate when you can apply, not everyone will have an opportunity to 'get in early'.
If you have a way to make the process simultaneously non-random, fair, and not have a cap (which I personally would probably be fine with eliminating but is presumably a non-starter for various political reasons), I'm sure some people would love to hear about it.
- Trundle 8y agoSure. Attach a price tag to it.
- stormbrew 8y agoAh yes, because "the people with the most money get in" is the absolute definition of fair for sure.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- ihsw2 8y agoSure, just make the process much more restrictive. The idea is to take in the best, not help the most vulnerable.