5 ms·
No, you are wrong. If you put all of your money into the S&P500 only at the absolute, single worst possible day (the market top on May 16th, 2008 at $1,425) yo
by et2o 8y ago
No, you are wrong.
If you put all of your money into the S&P500 only at the absolute, single worst possible day (the market top on May 16th, 2008 at $1,425) you would still be up about 100% today, 10 years later at $2,779 (So about 2X, just checked).
If you put money in "after the plummet," as you suggest, which is the best case scenario, (buying at the low of $735 in January of 2009) would put you up approximately 300% (4X).
The average investor would get somewhere between these two just by ignoring the market and investing biweekly.
I'm not even advising to go 100% for the S&P500 Index Funds. However that's an infinitely better idea than a portfolio that is 75% of Gold (Dumb), T Bills + Cash (Losing money everyday), and Bonds (Which are paying at near-historic lows). It's just bad advice.
- tonyedgecombe 8y agoNo, you are wrong. Do you think the quantitive easing had no affect then?
- et2o 8y agoQuite a non-sequitor
- tonyedgecombe 8y agoRead the original post, you will see the word 'and' in it.
- et2o 8y agoI'm quite aware. How does that have anything to do with my comments about portfolio selection and results?