> This is not the case, ergo their argument is flawed. Your argument doesn't really make sense. Nobody is arguing that nuclear is cheaper than dirty coal. Pr

> This is not the case, ergo their argument is flawed. Your argument doesn't really make sense. Nobody is arguing that nuclear is cheaper than dirty coal. Proponents argue that it's cheap and orders of magnitude more environmentally friendly than burning dirty coal. China is still very price conscious and are building out nuclear in an effort to reduce pollution - proving that the Chinese do believe nuclear can be done cheaply and safely.