LIDAR probably would have seen the obstacle and avoided it, but so would a human driver who was operating the vehicle responsibly and correctly. It sucks that p

LIDAR probably would have seen the obstacle and avoided it, but so would a human driver who was operating the vehicle responsibly and correctly. It sucks that people treat level 2 systems and level 3 or 4, but the same thing applies to many convenience features in a car (cruise control, power brakes, etc...). There's always going to be some bozo doing what they shouldn't be doing with something. I'd love to see LIDAR on consumer vehicles, but AFAIK it's prohibitively expensive. And to be fair, even Level 4 autonomous vehicles still crash into things and kill people. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-05-24/uber-self-driving-system-saw-pedestrian-killed-but-didn-t-stop https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-05-24/uber-self... Last but not least, every semi-autonomous system all the way back to Chrysler's "AUTO-PILOT" has had similar criticisms. People in the past even said similar things about high speed highways compared to other roads WRT attention. http://www.curbsideclassic.com/blog/history/automotive-history-capsule-chryslers-1958-auto-pilot-56-years-before-teslas-autopilot/ http://www.curbsideclassic.com/blog/history/automotive-histo... https://books.google.com/books?id=YpGkDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA100&lpg=PA100&dq=chrysler+imperial+%22auto-pilot%22+dangerous&source=bl&ots=EYrN1Ett0c&sig=cnmHySS-pnBXDBJR-159I7MiV8Y&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiFx6Slg8XbAhUJl5AKHRGXCKwQ6AEIcjAP#v=onepage&q=chrysler%20imperial%20%22auto-pilot%22%20dangerous&f=false https://books.google.com/books?id=YpGkDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA100&lpg=...