3 ms·
This is good as an alternative take: https://www.amazon.com/Debunking-Economics-Revised-Expanded-Dethroned/dp/1848139926 https://www.amazon.com/Debunking-Econom
by cahomeown456 8y ago
This is good as an alternative take: https://www.amazon.com/Debunking-Economics-Revised-Expanded-Dethroned/dp/1848139926 https://www.amazon.com/Debunking-Economics-Revised-Expanded-...
- nickik 8y agoYeah maybe don't start with some snake-oil anti-everything guy. Read the actual literature first and then go to those claiming to know better.
- RobertoG 8y agoOr better, read some review of the actual literature before investing in a book, to see if it's snake oil. For instance: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521915001477 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105752191... From the cited text: "The question is considered why the economics profession has failed over most of the past century to make any progress concerning knowledge of the monetary system, and why it instead moved ever further away from the truth as already recognised by the credit creation theory well over a century ago. The role of conflicts of interest and interested parties in shaping the current bank-free academic consensus is discussed."
- nickik 8y agoMy 100 year old theory is better then your 100 theory. Even if it has no support form most people who have spent their whole lives studying it.