>'You've been corrected two times now that the statistical testing methods you've been attacking are in fact not how the experiments are being done and that the

>'You've been corrected two times now that the statistical testing methods you've been attacking are in fact not how the experiments are being done and that the choice of null hypothesis that you've been attacking is not at all the null hypothesis that is being tested against." Quote this. Where? I am sure by "corrected" you mean "someone claimed something I believe to be wrong, so I continued to point out why." Amazingly, this looks like yet more strawman arguing...