3 ms·
IMO, chrome is a mis-use of pull-to-refresh. Where appropriate [eg: Tweetie, where it started; mail; youtube; facebook], you've got a reverse chronological lis
by systoll 8y ago
IMO, chrome is a mis-use of pull-to-refresh.
Where appropriate [eg: Tweetie, where it started; mail; youtube; facebook], you've got a reverse chronological listing, and 'pull-to-refresh' is more explicitly 'pull-to-put-new-content-above-the-current-page'. It's the other side of an infinite scroll.
If it destroys the current page, it shouldn't be on a scroll-up.