'Fairness' isn't a single optimal decision. It's a continuing debate, refreshed by new data and a refined awareness of consequences, especially those unanticip

'Fairness' isn't a single optimal decision. It's a continuing debate, refreshed by new data and a refined awareness of consequences, especially those unanticipated and unseen. Google isn't promising that they're done with the question of how to use data justly. They are promising that as the public debate continues over where the line is drawn and redrawn between fair use and abuse of data, they will be a willing participant in that debate, and that they're receptive to abiding by decisions that require compromise on their part. What more do you want?