5 ms·
> We want to be clear that while we are not developing AI for use in weapons... we will be developing AI for things that have weapons attached to them. We hope
by fortythirteen 8y ago
> We want to be clear that while we are not developing AI for use in weapons...
we will be developing AI for things that have weapons attached to them. We hope our lawyerly semantics are enough to fool you rubes for as long as it takes us to pocket that sweet military money.
- Barrin92 8y agoreminds me of the joke >"It should be noted that no ethically-trained software engineer would ever consent to write a NukeChicago procedure. Basic professional ethics would instead require him to write a NukeCity procedure, to which Chicago could be given as a parameter."