> I could have cameras, but I legitimately don’t want to provide footage to law enforcement. You could have or you would have? The logs are there, we usually

> I could have cameras, but I legitimately don’t want to provide footage to law enforcement. You could have or you would have? The logs are there, we usually have them, they don't cost much and they are pretty useful. Like his previous comment said, if you had never intended to have logs there or have reasons not to have logs (replace logs by camera in your situation), then there's nothing unethical about it. As he said it's not the result but the intent that make it unethical. In the same situation, it could actually be ethical to not have logs, let say to allow people to communicate behind a corrupt government that want to silence them.