3 ms·
If we aren't going to mark this as dupe, I'll repeat my comment from the thread yesterday: Per the article, backed by "several hundred employees" out of a 2017
by lainga 8y ago
If we aren't going to mark this as dupe, I'll repeat my comment from the thread yesterday: Per the article, backed by "several hundred employees" out of a 2017 Alphabet headcount of 80,110.
- ihsw2 8y agoPopularity is not a measure of validity.
- lainga 8y agoI'll also repeat sonnyblarney's comment: What's also kind of buried [in the article] is that the 'employees' are a small fraction of Google's staff and do not represent the overall staff at company, as the headline kind of implies.
- hyperbovine 8y agoSure it is, when the rulemaking procedure is by majority vote.
- jonlucc 8y agoThe rule making procedure, if I’m not mistaken, is majority vote of shares. That’s why the article says that the proposals did not pass.