2 ms·

Thank for for posting this. I posted a similar link which gained 70+ upvotes within minutes before being deleted with no explanation.

• dang 8y ago
  Your post was flagged by users, as is explained by the annotation [flagged].
  • falcon620 8y ago
    That flagging scheme of yours allows a subgroup, in this case likely C# devs whose careers are aligned with the success of Microsoft to very efficiently silence any dissent. I don't think this is something that has caught you by surprise, so why do you allow it?
    • dang 8y ago
      You've simply imagined this: "likely C# devs whose careers are aligned with the success of Microsoft". Once you frame it that way, it sounds terrible, but there's no evidence for it and the data I looked at doesn't support it. Your question "why do you allow it" has a similar framing. The answer is that we don't allow it. The much more common case is that users don't want to see things that are clearly off topic for HN, such as teacup internet dramas. As I explained above, the overwhelming verdict of HN users is that there's nothing serious in this story. If they thought otherwise, it would certainly be on HN's front page. That's the flagging system working as intended.
      • falcon620 8y ago
        I disagree. I think lots of valuable stories are being buried by organized niche interests. I hope to be able expose some of this.