3 ms·
Nothing which a normal 'non microsoft' developer would profit from. Even their contributions to Linux were mostly about running Windows on Linux and the other w
by herbst 8y ago
Nothing which a normal 'non microsoft' developer would profit from. Even their contributions to Linux were mostly about running Windows on Linux and the other way around. Nothing a non Microsoft dev would even care about.
Google however maintains a few products that can easily be considered standard, or at least will find their way in any other developer stack.
- nikofeyn 8y agowhat is a non-microsoft developer? these are open platforms that happen to be made by microsoft. if you use google’s open source projects are you now a google developer? and visual studio code is probably used more for web development than it is .net work. it certainly is the major selling point of it on the website.
- herbst 8y agoAgreed that is weird wording. When I look at my environment there are basically 2 kind of developers (from this point of view) those who do Net and use the MS stack, and those who don't do Net and at max worked with VS code. I really don't know a lot of people who do anything with the MS stack. And those who do code on and for Microsoft (which already is a minority) I personally don't know anyone who switched from Atom or Sublime to VS. Only VS users I know have been using real VS before.