2 ms·
Epyc chip (the package including the 4 ASICS) is pretty huge. It's a decent fraction of a mini-itx motherboard just for the socket. The good news is that whil
by sliken 8y ago
Epyc chip (the package including the 4 ASICS) is pretty huge. It's a decent fraction of a mini-itx motherboard just for the socket. The good news is that while it takes twice the power (170-190 watts or so, 250 in the next generation) it's much easier to dissipate that much with such a large chip. The head density is as low or lower than previous generations.
AMD was pretty krafty with this generation. Intel has a huge R&D budget, has it's own fabs, and pushes many different ASICs split into a dizzying array of products. Intel can afford this because they have a MUCH higher volume of parts to amortize the costs over.
To compete at many different price/power/performance points AMD uses the exact same ASIC for desktop (1 ASICs with 2 memory channels), workstation (2 ASICs with 4 memory channels), and server (4 ASICS with 8 memory channels).
Now AMD can compete across a decent fraction of Intel's produces with a single ASIC and spend more R&D on the second generation without having to re-engineer an entire family of ASICs.
Compare any photos of a threadripper or epyc chip, they are easily visible even onstage, it's about as big as the palm of your hand. I believe it's 69.2 mm x 57.9 mm according to a spec I found on the TR4 socket.