The specific part about interpreting laws says > The Court of Justice arbitrates on Community law and pursues a particular, but no less rigorous application of

The specific part about interpreting laws says > The Court of Justice arbitrates on Community law and pursues a particular, but no less rigorous application of multilingualism. ... each authentic text is considered independent for the purpose of interpretation by the courts and despite being translations, judgements and other documents are deemed to be authentic only if they are the language of the case. On the other hand, as none of them prevails and they all have the same meaning, whenever linguistic divergence or ambiguity arises, the European Court of Justice consults all the texts of a given instrument on a routine basis. Interpreting the intended meaning of the single instrument is given priority over any linguistic discrepancies and this is why revisers and translators of the European Court of Justice need to be lawyers.