> But the parent's comment is missing the point That was my point. I wanted to point out that while some people have only/first heard about failover in the con

> But the parent's comment is missing the point That was my point. I wanted to point out that while some people have only/first heard about failover in the context of kubernetes, it is not something that is specific to kubernetes or even the problem that kubernetes was build to solve. Of course it is not designed to be a failover solution specifically and using it (exclusively) as such would be ill-advised; I was just trying to be diplomatic while pointing that out.