> He's making specific, testable, claims And that is good, you can specifically test the claims > with no references The blog is a guest post by Rob Wolff wi

> He's making specific, testable, claims And that is good, you can specifically test the claims > with no references The blog is a guest post by Rob Wolff with an excerpt from his book, where the references are. > and encouraging people to make potentially damaging changes to their diets. Woah, avoiding lectins for 30 days potentially damaging? Everything is possible I guess, but that seems not only highly unlikely, but a stark contrast to the point of the recommendation: a potentially beneficial change to their diets. > That demands a slightly higher standard of evidence than somebody's cute code samples or kid photos. I don't see why, because I don't see any possible danger whatsoever in avoiding grains for a month. If I'm wrong, please illuminate me. I am admittedly, another anecdote case of positive outcome from avoiding grains.