5 ms·

What would be the excuse to flat out ignore all those desperate user requests then? Issue list: https://github.com/jfitzell/mozilla-keychain/issues/88#issuecom

What would be the excuse to flat out ignore all those desperate user requests then? Issue list: https://github.com/jfitzell/mozilla-keychain/issues/88#issuecomment-332331685 https://github.com/jfitzell/mozilla-keychain/issues/88#issue...

Spivak 8y ago
"Why is an organization spending their money on things that I personally don't care about? Large groups of people can only do ever one thing at a time and problems can always be solved faster by throwing money at them."
- eklavya 8y ago
  Are you making this statement after looking at the issues I linked?
staticassertion 8y ago
Nice - can't have a Mozilla related article without someone posting their pet bug.
- eklavya 8y ago
  Why not? Do you feel what I wrote was unrelated, off topic, not important?
  - staticassertion 8y ago
    Yeah, it was a really low content post, for sure. It didn't have much to do with the article at all - or even the same organization, technically. And in every topic like this, ones about Mozilla's spending (or sometimes Chrome or any other org that has a popular, free product), someone feels the need to say "but why not this one bug that I harp on?" really, really consistently.
    - eklavya 8y ago
      Treating users this way "harping about a bug" is a surefire way to lose market share. I wonder if this is really the case. I didn't know about the organisational structure. For a lot of people Mozilla IS Firefox. How was it low content? In a post about spending am I not allowed to specify my opinion about the spending? You can think of me as some entitled jerk and that's your opinion and I myself doubt I might be acting like one. "But" I would expect that you would allow me to at least say how I feel about it. It's not a technical debate, there can be multiple points of view not necessarily right or wrong.
awalton 8y ago
Whataboutmeism in Open Source is just as toxic as Whataboutism is to Politics.

Spivak 8y ago

"Why is an organization spending their money on things that I personally don't care about? Large groups of people can only do ever one thing at a time and problems can always be solved faster by throwing money at them."

eklavya 8y ago
Are you making this statement after looking at the issues I linked?

staticassertion 8y ago

Nice - can't have a Mozilla related article without someone posting their pet bug.

eklavya 8y ago
Why not? Do you feel what I wrote was unrelated, off topic, not important?
- staticassertion 8y ago
  Yeah, it was a really low content post, for sure. It didn't have much to do with the article at all - or even the same organization, technically. And in every topic like this, ones about Mozilla's spending (or sometimes Chrome or any other org that has a popular, free product), someone feels the need to say "but why not this one bug that I harp on?" really, really consistently.
  - eklavya 8y ago
    Treating users this way "harping about a bug" is a surefire way to lose market share. I wonder if this is really the case. I didn't know about the organisational structure. For a lot of people Mozilla IS Firefox. How was it low content? In a post about spending am I not allowed to specify my opinion about the spending? You can think of me as some entitled jerk and that's your opinion and I myself doubt I might be acting like one. "But" I would expect that you would allow me to at least say how I feel about it. It's not a technical debate, there can be multiple points of view not necessarily right or wrong.

awalton 8y ago

Whataboutmeism in Open Source is just as toxic as Whataboutism is to Politics.