3 ms·
This doesn't square with my experience. HFT reduces transaction costs for market participants. You can see this in the narrowing of bid/ask spreads from the ear
by jeffreyrogers 8y ago
This doesn't square with my experience. HFT reduces transaction costs for market participants. You can see this in the narrowing of bid/ask spreads from the early 2000s on. Corporations exist for many reasons, but I wouldn't say benefiting the wealthy is the primary reason. More important reasons seem to be: limiting liability for owners, formalizing ownership structures so that owners can benefit in proportion to their role in the business, and simplifying tax and accounting issues.
I agree that the growth in regulation has negative consequences and that the education system is largely ineffective, but I think these are unintended consequences rather than the result of conscious manipulation by powerful people and organizations.
- crdoconnor 8y ago>HFT reduces transaction costs for market participants. You can see this in the narrowing of bid/ask spreads If HFT were a net positive for market participants then those same participants wouldn't be fleeing to dark pools in an attempt to avoid them.
- jeffreyrogers 8y agoThey go to dark pools because they are less transparent and it's easier to sell large blocks of shares without making a large price impact (in theory at least).
- crdoconnor 8y agoExactly. I believe the term HFT uses for exploiting that is "spearing whales".
- smolder 8y agoCapitalism primarily benefits capital holders, and you don't think one of its central constructs serves that purpose? You don't think people with [absurdly concentrated] power exercise it to help themselves, as rational actors? My understanding isn't without nuance, nor am I trying to claim I have a replacement system. I'm just being intellectually honest about these elephants in the room.