4 ms·
so, I'd have said the exact same thing about the millennium development goals (MDGs) until a few months ago when I attended a talk by the former secretary of th
by cryoshon 8y ago
so, I'd have said the exact same thing about the millennium development goals (MDGs) until a few months ago when I attended a talk by the former secretary of the UN, Ban Ki-Moon.
Ban had many wonderful things to say, but one thing really shook me. he said that as a leader of the UN, he had failed in fostering the world's development, as had his recent predecessors.
he then went on to say that accomplishing the MDGs and specifically slashing severe poverty was largely an illusion if you approach it from the perspective of international collaboration. he said that nearly all of the MDGs which were met were met because china had reinvested in its own country to the extent that its massive population's standard of living had substantially improved.
that's it. not international collaboration. not the west's efforts to pull others out of poverty. just china doing the best that it could for itself over a long period of time, with the amazing conclusion of those efforts coinciding with the deadlines for the MDGs.
so yeah, the world is getting better -- but it isn't necessarily the whole world, and it isn't necessarily because of our efforts to improve things, and we definitely can't relax.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- Dirlewanger 8y agoIs there a recording/YouTube of this talk?
- cryoshon 8y agodon't think so. here's the reportage: https://www.bu.edu/today/2018/ban-ki-moon/ https://www.bu.edu/today/2018/ban-ki-moon/
- stealthmodeclan 8y agoBut the iPhone made in China is sold in America. China couldn't possibly bring all those people out of poverty without massive demand for their manufactered goods in foreign market. You can possibly argue all this has happened at expense of west.