I mean, that's based on a particularly aggressive route of transmission. I think the much more useful examples are to read old historical accounts of every day

I mean, that's based on a particularly aggressive route of transmission. I think the much more useful examples are to read old historical accounts of every day life. People died of things we now simply assume to be safe - shaving, for example. There are all manner of modern interactions we have with the world and especially the medical system where the expectation is "I won't die during this" - and much of that relies on access to effective antibiotics. Antibiotic resistance is unlikely to cause an epidemic in the same way as flu. What it's much more likely to do is make people have worse outcomes forever. You won't get gonorrhea any more than you do right now - but if you do it's not a quick course of antibiotics. It's a painful infection followed by the distinct possibility of sterility.