"Wang allowed quality inspectors, company cooks and cleaners to subscribe for shares at a negligible cost based on their position and years of service." I dete

"Wang allowed quality inspectors, company cooks and cleaners to subscribe for shares at a negligible cost based on their position and years of service." I detect a certain resentment in this piece, as though only execs should get to share in company fortunes. To me, the only fair way to distribute the spoils is for all the workers (and execs) to own a stake, pretty much based on the formula above, maybe additionally modified for "level of contribution, impact etc". Of course there's then the wider question of how wealth should be distributed through society, when janitors in successful companies are making more than phD's in failing ones, but it seems not less fair than the current system of "millionare execs" and everyone else can race to the bottom for "market-rate pay".