Lying in public seems pretty relevant to an article about lying to Congress. He didn't call anyone a name, he mentioned specific actions: namely, lying. I obv

Lying in public seems pretty relevant to an article about lying to Congress. He didn't call anyone a name, he mentioned specific actions: namely, lying. I obviously can't speak to whether he'd say these things face to face, but you can't either. It sure seems like he made a good faith effort to raise his concerns, though. The articles he linked to are well reasoned and anything but shallow. Your argument, on the other hand, seems like a pretty shallow dismissal.