4 ms·
"I'd guess that this is more due to the popularity of GitHub among potential contributiors to these projects." Doesn't that support bmsleight's point? If Githu
by captaincrowbar 8y ago
"I'd guess that this is more due to the popularity of GitHub among potential contributiors to these projects."
Doesn't that support bmsleight's point? If Github is more popular than NotGithub, even among the developers of NotGithub, that doesn't exactly inspire confidence in NotGithub.
- megablast 8y agoNo, it is about making a compromise because you live in the real world.
- exrook 8y agoOh, it definitely could be considered as evidence that Github is a better platform for code hosting than gitea, gogs, etc. However I think that the difference is popularity is far more likely to be caused by network effects around Github as well as Github's comparative age. There are also other factors impacting a users's decision to choose one hosting platform/software over another unrelated to the functionality of the software, such as code licensing and self hosting capability. In summary, popularity certainly can be an indicator of whether or not a software or service is worth using, but it's not a direct measure of the quality or robustness or whatever other factors you may care about when making a decision.
- nerdponx 8y agoThis isn't a social network. There's more to a source code hosting platform than popularity.
- atomi 8y agoFor me it's the ability to self host on cheap hardware. For that Gogs gets my support.