Or maybe it shows that the LA Times still tries to be, ya know, a paper for people in LA so they are happy to wait for a one click GDPR solution from upstream o

Or maybe it shows that the LA Times still tries to be, ya know, a paper for people in LA so they are happy to wait for a one click GDPR solution from upstream or whatever, and prioritize the technology investment for something else. It bit me too but it's their fundamental right.