I'm not here to judge the LA Times' determination that they make more money blocking the EU than they do allowing it with reduced data collection; nor am I maki

I'm not here to judge the LA Times' determination that they make more money blocking the EU than they do allowing it with reduced data collection; nor am I making a value judgement of the GDPR. What I'd like to say is that if you don't actively oppose the GDPR, and you are a voter in the EU, then complaining about the LA Times not bothering to service your jurisdiction is kinda weak. Evidently the GDPR, all things considered, is preventing this person from reading the LA Times, in the same way that California's temporary ban on foie gras prevented Californians from enjoying foie gras. Regulations on the duties of business affect the rights of individuals.