4 ms·
It could be what they intended. It's a good way to be sure they only provide free services to projects that would never be paying customers. If an organization
by sciurus 8y ago
It could be what they intended. It's a good way to be sure they only provide free services to projects that would never be paying customers. If an organization can pay someone to work on an open-source project, they could also pay Gitlab to provide services to that project.
- schoen 8y agoThat's a very good point. Maybe "noncommercial" here is in fact meant to capture something like "lacking in financial resources" rather than literally "noncommercial".