6 ms·

Exactly. > If there's anything I want Gitlab to copy from GitHub, it's the opinionated decision making of what to show and when to show it. Thing is, that wil

Exactly. > If there's anything I want Gitlab to copy from GitHub, it's the opinionated decision making of what to show and when to show it. Thing is, that will never happen. The project has already sprawled out of control and if they tried to remove things or drastically change the product users would just start forking the project. Or someone would copy GitLab and make a totally open source clone (that'd be ironic). On a side note, does the issue tracker for GitLab CE worry anyone else? https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues Nearly 11k issues some from 3 years ago.

jacquesm 8y ago
For as long as I have seen your account you are in every github/gitlab thread pushing github and bashing gitlab. Care to disclose something?
- aedocw 8y ago
  Really interesting observation, does look pretty shady.
- spockz 8y ago
  In all fairness, I wouldn’t classify the parent post of bashing. Exaggerating, at most.
- SirYandi 8y ago
  Wow. Looking through his post history is like one big github sales pitch and gitlab defamation frenzy. Surely a shill if I've ever seen one
  - donarb 8y ago
    Do you have any evidence this person is a paid advocate?
- irq11 8y ago
  How is this different than the pro-Gitlab people, who are on the same threads doing the opposite? I’m personally tired of seeing Gitlab employees and fanchildren spamming every halfway-related thread on HN. If there’s someone here advocating for Github, he’s a refreshing change of pace.
  - briandear 8y ago
    It’s true. I have a perception that there is frequent GitLab advocacy going on on HN. Almost as if their team uses HN as a de facto marketing channel. Any announcement from GitLab immediately gets upvoted to the front page. And the prior commentor being accused of being a Github shill— is that any different than the frequent comments from the same cast of characters promoting GitLab? Plenty of shills on here and they aren’t generally the Github people. Every GitLab story’s comments consist of a barrage of comments complaining about Github. An impartial observer could be led to believe that there is some astroturfing happening. I know a lot of developers and not a single one uses GitLab. But if the HN sample is representative, it seems like most developers hate Github. The GitLab/Github threads don’t seem to track with my real world observations. Github changed software development for the better. It isn’t perfect, but acting like a Github clone is the second coming of source control management is getting tired. Use whatever the hell you want. The seemingly non-stop discussion about SCM systems is getting stale. Unless GitLab does some incredible innovation, why must we keep seeing stories about it getting voted to the front page? Unless Github does something especially evil, why must we be constantly be taking and complaining about it? Every time GitLab makes an announcement, they get free advertising by virtue of the upvote cabal. Seriously it’s like HN has become their PR agency. Every time Mixpanel or New Relic or Codeship or Travis CI posts a blog post announcement, it doesn’t make the front page — neither does the press release announcements of dozens of more relevant startups than GitLab. GitLab announces a pricing change! OMG, let’s vote it to the front page because everyone in the Hacker News community should care! GitLab is “open core” and apparently Github is evil because it’s closed source. GitLab is cheaper and that’s important because spending $12 per month for private repos is just offensive. Good grief. It’s getting as ridiculous as the Windows-Mac debates 10 years ago. Unless GitLab actually creates some new innovation, I vote for a moratorium on any stories about them making the front page; a pricing change is hardly interesting. HN ought not co-opted as a free marketing channel. The past few days, Hacker News should have been called GitLab News.
- praneshp 8y ago
  How is it different from you yelling at everyone on GDPR threads? Maybe, like you, the parent is just passionate and opinionated.
  - jacquesm 8y ago
    It's different because I don't have a commercial stake in the game, I just really care about privacy and my posting history and blogging history back that up. I find it odd that someone would pick one commercial entity over another when they're otherwise anonymous, which is yet another thing you really can't say about me. So that's how it is different.
    - praneshp 8y ago
      You couldn't prove they had a commercial stake, and they also seem to really care about github vs gitlab. It's not too different yet.
      - jacquesm 8y ago
        Github vs Gitlab is one commercial party against another, if the products are roughly comparable and you want to take a very strong stand in favor of either party you should declare your affiliation (or none). ACs that from the very beginning seem to have an agenda are always under that cloud, and it's easy enough to dispel any doubt. Contrary to that there is no gain for me to be a privacy advocate.

jacquesm 8y ago

For as long as I have seen your account you are in every github/gitlab thread pushing github and bashing gitlab. Care to disclose something?

aedocw 8y ago
Really interesting observation, does look pretty shady.
spockz 8y ago
In all fairness, I wouldn’t classify the parent post of bashing. Exaggerating, at most.
SirYandi 8y ago
Wow. Looking through his post history is like one big github sales pitch and gitlab defamation frenzy. Surely a shill if I've ever seen one
- donarb 8y ago
  Do you have any evidence this person is a paid advocate?
irq11 8y ago
How is this different than the pro-Gitlab people, who are on the same threads doing the opposite? I’m personally tired of seeing Gitlab employees and fanchildren spamming every halfway-related thread on HN. If there’s someone here advocating for Github, he’s a refreshing change of pace.
- briandear 8y ago
  It’s true. I have a perception that there is frequent GitLab advocacy going on on HN. Almost as if their team uses HN as a de facto marketing channel. Any announcement from GitLab immediately gets upvoted to the front page. And the prior commentor being accused of being a Github shill— is that any different than the frequent comments from the same cast of characters promoting GitLab? Plenty of shills on here and they aren’t generally the Github people. Every GitLab story’s comments consist of a barrage of comments complaining about Github. An impartial observer could be led to believe that there is some astroturfing happening. I know a lot of developers and not a single one uses GitLab. But if the HN sample is representative, it seems like most developers hate Github. The GitLab/Github threads don’t seem to track with my real world observations. Github changed software development for the better. It isn’t perfect, but acting like a Github clone is the second coming of source control management is getting tired. Use whatever the hell you want. The seemingly non-stop discussion about SCM systems is getting stale. Unless GitLab does some incredible innovation, why must we keep seeing stories about it getting voted to the front page? Unless Github does something especially evil, why must we be constantly be taking and complaining about it? Every time GitLab makes an announcement, they get free advertising by virtue of the upvote cabal. Seriously it’s like HN has become their PR agency. Every time Mixpanel or New Relic or Codeship or Travis CI posts a blog post announcement, it doesn’t make the front page — neither does the press release announcements of dozens of more relevant startups than GitLab. GitLab announces a pricing change! OMG, let’s vote it to the front page because everyone in the Hacker News community should care! GitLab is “open core” and apparently Github is evil because it’s closed source. GitLab is cheaper and that’s important because spending $12 per month for private repos is just offensive. Good grief. It’s getting as ridiculous as the Windows-Mac debates 10 years ago. Unless GitLab actually creates some new innovation, I vote for a moratorium on any stories about them making the front page; a pricing change is hardly interesting. HN ought not co-opted as a free marketing channel. The past few days, Hacker News should have been called GitLab News.
praneshp 8y ago
How is it different from you yelling at everyone on GDPR threads? Maybe, like you, the parent is just passionate and opinionated.
- jacquesm 8y ago
  It's different because I don't have a commercial stake in the game, I just really care about privacy and my posting history and blogging history back that up. I find it odd that someone would pick one commercial entity over another when they're otherwise anonymous, which is yet another thing you really can't say about me. So that's how it is different.
  - praneshp 8y ago
    You couldn't prove they had a commercial stake, and they also seem to really care about github vs gitlab. It's not too different yet.
    - jacquesm 8y ago
      Github vs Gitlab is one commercial party against another, if the products are roughly comparable and you want to take a very strong stand in favor of either party you should declare your affiliation (or none). ACs that from the very beginning seem to have an agenda are always under that cloud, and it's easy enough to dispel any doubt. Contrary to that there is no gain for me to be a privacy advocate.