4 ms·
WhatsApp had a subscriber model (99 cents per year). It was still very successful in India, a relatively poor country. I remember visiting villages in India, wh
by alokrai 8y ago
WhatsApp had a subscriber model (99 cents per year). It was still very successful in India, a relatively poor country. I remember visiting villages in India, where people who are quite poor by western standards, still preferred using WhatsApp to other services.
I think that reasonably priced subscription model, perhaps taking in account the per capita income of the country, could help preserve privacy while also ensuring mass access to technologies.
- majidazimi 8y agoThe problem is greedy attitude of people. As long as one can earn more by selling user information, there is no incentive for reasonably priced subscription model.
- mcintyre1994 8y agoDo you know that those Indian people had actually paid for WhatsApp? I never had to pay, and most people I know (UK) don't seem to have done either. I don't know what the criteria was but it'd be pretty weird if they were charging people more aggressively in India than the UK. Maybe the whole not charging thing was a bug, it's always seemed weird.
- skinnymuch 8y agoI don’t think many if any Indian people actually paid for Whatsapp. Most people overall didn’t pay for it.