3 ms·
[deleted]
by _jayy 8y ago
[deleted]
- zajd 8y ago"refined" ie put in a place where you can control him explicitly
- _jayy 8y ago[deleted]
- kingbirdy 8y agoActually, the letter says "On the assumption that you have no wish to depart the Company, the elements of a CTO job description the Company considers important are set out in the attached proposed job description. We invite your comments on that draft." So without the contents of the attachment, we can't know what actions you're saying you expect of him.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- vesak 8y agoWho's we here? The documents seem to imply that you have 50%, Daniel has 50%. Are you referring to yourself in plural?
- _jayy 8y ago[deleted]
- jhayward 8y agoWho is 'we'? Don't be coy.
- rhencke 8y agoWhy publicly name out real people who may not have any involvement in this issue whatsoever? What did they do to deserve that?
- jhayward 8y ago> Why publicly name out real people who may not have any involvement He's claiming to speak for them as 'we'. They're either involved, or he's confabulating. Which is it?
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]