I mean, the author is decentralizing the basic download and cloning of git. The protocol lets us do that. Git by itself doesn't have issue tracking, wikis, etc

I mean, the author is decentralizing the basic download and cloning of git. The protocol lets us do that. Git by itself doesn't have issue tracking, wikis, etc. Those are part of Github/lab/bucket. Should the git project seek to add this as part of the repo and protocol itself? Or should we be making new protocols and repositories for this meta-project/code data? I haven't tried Fossil yet, but I understand it has a lot of this stuff built into its protocol/repository format.