3 ms·
I hear this sentiment a lot. Here's why it doesn't work: If facebook sets the price at $20/mo for no ads no tracking, most of the people who can afford that ac
by obblekk 8y ago
I hear this sentiment a lot. Here's why it doesn't work:
If facebook sets the price at $20/mo for no ads no tracking, most of the people who can afford that actually generate more than $20/mo of ARPU for facebook with ads. So they get this adverse selection where mostly only the wealthy (highly valuable advertising targets) opt out of ads and this eventually decreases FB's revenue.
If they raised the price to offset this, the adverse selection would get even stronger.
The flip side of this is that Netflix could almost certainly make more money if they showed interstitial video ads, because this allows them to effectively make more money off wealthier people (because advertisers pay more to advertise to them).
- Rjevski 8y ago> most of the people who can afford that actually generate more than $20/mo of ARPU for facebook with ads How so? I’ve never clicked on an ad other than by accident, and I actively despise any brand that tried to push me their garbage via ads. I’m not sure I ageee with you there. I’d say most people who can afford that are actually making Facebook less money because they’re smart enough to see through the bullshit and ignore the ads.