2 ms·
Whoops, the boxes around arrows wasn't supposed to be there. The colors are arbitrary and could be changed to remain consistent with HN. As for the alternating
by MrAlmostWrong 16y ago
Whoops, the boxes around arrows wasn't supposed to be there. The colors are arbitrary and could be changed to remain consistent with HN. As for the alternating row colors they help me (obviously we differ) in scanning the site.
- devmonk 16y agoI'm having trouble finding a link, but there have been user experience studies involving heat maps, etc. showing that any unnecessary visual elements distract the user. I'm with you that I like the idea of having a strong visual indicator to differentiate different posts, but studies in UE have proven that the age-old "use zebra coloring to differentiate rows" that was used in accounting notebooks and perforated printer paper in the mid-20th century up until the 80s draws users' eyes away from the content in order to differentiate. Basically it is annoying to our brains and slows us down, but programmers like straight lines and making things neat, so the aesthetic nature of the differentiation in color and its assumed practical purpose makes us erroneously choose it over the visually simpler option.
- MrAlmostWrong 16y ago(In reply to devmonk) Interesting, I never read that, but now I'll have to see if I can find the study you talk about. Like I mentioned before I would rather increase the font size and then space things out a bit more, but that would offer less links on a page so it becomes a compromise. Thinking of the type of audience HN attracts one would think people wouldn't have a problem bumping up the size in their browsers although that can be annoying to do.