3 ms·
An incredibly good source, isn't it? That on top of the consistent details provided by his unnamed sources, and the corroboration that's surfaced since.
by notveryrational 8y ago
An incredibly good source, isn't it? That on top of the consistent details provided by his unnamed sources, and the corroboration that's surfaced since.
- tptacek 8y agoThe director of ISI in 1992, retired for decades (plural) at the time the story ran? No, not an especially good source. Also, he appears to have changed his story since Hersh reported it.