> Open Source is more than that, it is actually more "free" than "Free Software". The remainder of your post you only talk about Richard Stallman. Sure, RMS is

> Open Source is more than that, it is actually more "free" than "Free Software". The remainder of your post you only talk about Richard Stallman. Sure, RMS is the father of Free Software, but that doens't mean RMS's beliefs are all perfectly aligned with it. If you wish to argue about OSS vs Free Software, you should be arguing about licenses, movements, and emergent behaviours and incentive structures within each of them. Arguing about one single person's beliefs on either side will not be productive. No one person defines OSS or Free Software in full. By way of example, I disagree with RMS politically and on many many other subjects, but I still believe the free software movement to be better long-term than the OSS movement.