2 ms·
Thanks that's good to know. Haha I knew "legacy" would ruffle some feathers, by which I mean Stan was pretty much the first application-ready PPS on the block
by boltzmannbrain 8y ago
Thanks that's good to know.
Haha I knew "legacy" would ruffle some feathers, by which I mean Stan was pretty much the first application-ready PPS on the block -- robust toolbox of methods, actively developed/supported.
The last slide of this presentation on SMC inference in PPLs is a nice view of the PPS landscape (not to mention the whole deck is a great intro by Lawrence Murray): http://www.it.uu.se/research/systems_and_control/education/2017/smc/schedule/lecture17.pdf http://www.it.uu.se/research/systems_and_control/education/2...
- currymj 8y agoYeah, I see what you're getting at now. And that is an excellent diagram. I've never actually used BUGS or JAGS for anything but I would consider at least BUGS to truly be legacy software. To me the word "legacy" means you shouldn't pick it for a new project.