4 ms·

Maybe it is because I am not a native English speaker but I had a different understanding of the headline than some people here. I read it as "an alternative to

• catach 8y ago
  > I read it as "an alternative to Git, which is also open source" As a native English speaker I'd say that's a perfectly reasonable interpretation. And I think most would have assumed that interpretation had it not been for the MS/Github news.
• open-source-ux 8y ago
  I read it as "an alternative to Git, which is also open source" and not an implied argument that Git is not open source... I posted the link (and accompanying title or headline) and your interpretation of the title (now changed) is exactly what I intended to convey.