3 ms·
> You were implying, with your statement, that her gender was relevant. It wasn't. No. You read intent where there was none. > There's no other way to interpr
by stephenr 8y ago
> You were implying, with your statement, that her gender was relevant. It wasn't.
No. You read intent where there was none.
> There's no other way to interpret that there.
Well clearly there is because it's not my comments getting down-voted to oblivion.
- Mononokay 8y agoMine certainly aren't; collective total of five up on them. I have to wonder what you feel the need to prove to the world.