Sure. I still think that is fair enough, in particular since there are actual contracts involved here. However, as you say, it is not clear at all. If that is

Sure. I still think that is fair enough, in particular since there are actual contracts involved here. However, as you say, it is not clear at all. If that is the problem, the New York Times should write an article about that, not 5000 words of all kinds of insinuations, with the goal, it would seem, to generate the maximum amount of confusion, least amount of education, and thus the most amount of outrage.