I can’t believe there are comments here supporting the “baker’s right” to refuse service on these grounds. >The Colorado Court of Appeals ruled that Mr. Philli

I can’t believe there are comments here supporting the “baker’s right” to refuse service on these grounds. >The Colorado Court of Appeals ruled that Mr. Phillips’s free speech rights had not been violated, noting that the couple had not discussed the cake’s design before Mr. Phillips turned them down. This is a public business refusing service to a person(s) because of their sexual orentiation. This is no different than refusing service to an interracial couple because you dont believe in race-mixing. Yes, they could have gone to another bakery but that isn’t the point. Do you understand why anti-discriminatory laws exist? Step out of your privileged bubble and read some fucking civil rights and LGBT history.