That analogy isn't really what's happened in this case, no one is saying a baker would be forced to make a specific type of cake they otherwise wouldn't offer.

That analogy isn't really what's happened in this case, no one is saying a baker would be forced to make a specific type of cake they otherwise wouldn't offer. The better analogy to your situation is a baker (gay or otherwise) who refused to bake cakes for women. Which, by the way, under current law would in fact be illegal.