4 ms·
On the comparison with GitLab you mention we don't support IPv6. We do if you host your own. We will enable it for GitLab.com once we're done with the migratio
by jobvandervoort 8y ago
On the comparison with GitLab you mention we don't support IPv6. We do if you host your own.
We will enable it for GitLab.com once we're done with the migration to GCP [0].
Our pricing is per user, tiered. Not per-user and then per feature. Although I understand that's not far off from each other.[1]
[0]: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/47216 https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/47216
[1]: https://about.gitlab.com/pricing/ https://about.gitlab.com/pricing/
- jaimex2 8y agoIs IPv6 a driver for anyone?
- jobvandervoort 8y agoI have not heard it mentioned by any user / customer / other community member in the last year, but I think it makes sense to support it.
- ancarda 8y agoIt's a nice to have - but not a dealbreaker - for me. Since I've been using GitHub for years, I am already locked into a platform that's IPv4 only. If I'm moving somewhere new, I'd like to have IPv6 if possible.
- justinclift 8y agoFor us, we have a large userbase in China, and my understanding (could be wrong!) is that Chinese users generally use IPv6. We're hosted on GitHub presently though, so I don't have access to the server logs to see if I'm wrong about that. :)
- ishanjain28 8y agoWifi in my college only supports Ipv6.
- martimarkov 8y agoJust out of curiosity why did you decide to use GCP rather than Azure or AWS?
- jobvandervoort 8y agoWe currently run on Azure. GitLab integrates deeply with Kubernetes and specifically GKE, so it makes sense to run GitLab.com there: https://about.gitlab.com/2018/04/05/gke-gitlab-integration/ https://about.gitlab.com/2018/04/05/gke-gitlab-integration/
- steve19 8y agoI am sure getting off your main competitors platform is a huge win now!
- gtirloni 8y agoAre you saying MS would sabotage Gitlab.com on Azure? Isn't Netflix running on the same platform (AWS) as Amazon Prime? Realistic speaking, what's the huge win for GitLab?
- steve19 8y agoTo answer your question: no I was not implying that. All it takes a someone in the billing department leaking metadata to a project manager for confidential information to leak (traffic numbers, storage trends etc.). Sure trust every employee of your only real competitor if you want, but I wouldn't if it was my business and I had alternatives.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- parvenu74 8y agoWhy should GitLab abandon Azure? Things are working for them just fine. Now when Google acquires GitLab I'm sure that moving to GCP will be a requirements but until then there's no threat to GitLab just because they are running on a platform owned by a Platinum member of the Linux foundation (something Amazon and Google can't say).
- telmich 8y agoWe will update this information, thanks for your pointer jobvandervoort!
- telmich 8y agoAnd just updated.
- kojon55 8y agoWhat could anybody need IPv6 on a website for? Users who don’t have IPv4 connectivity or what?
- telmich 8y agoThe problem with github (indepently of the recent news) is that it is not reachable from IPv6 only networks. And while you might have seen many of them yet, they are getting more and more the standard in data centers, which makes sense, because running dual stack is more effort and error prone.
- SJetKaran 8y agoQuestion: What is ur LFS pricing for GitLab.com? I see that you mention "Object storage for LFS" on the self-hosted comparison page, but not on the GitLab.com pricing comparison page (https://about.gitlab.com/pricing/self-hosted/feature-comparison/ https://about.gitlab.com/pricing/self-hosted/feature-compari...).