2 ms·
> The employee's claims weren't true for the part you were talking about I was talking about Tom Preston Werner harassing a staff member and the company then p
by stephenr 8y ago
> The employee's claims weren't true for the part you were talking about
I was talking about Tom Preston Werner harassing a staff member and the company then publicly denying it happened.
If you read some other meaning out of what I said, that's on you.
> since you used "female engineer" like it meant something hedious
> Just say "Engineer," because otherwise it sounds like they sexually harrassed her or something
I don't keep a notebook on me at all times with the names of every developer who's ever been harassed at their job. I just happened to remember that a woman had made allegations against the guy who wrote this fucking blog post, while he was CEO of the company. Not everything is a fucking feminist "plot", ok? We're not all amorphous grey blobs and any further distinction is not automatically a pro/anti gender political platform.
- Mononokay 8y agoYou were implying, with your statement, that her gender was relevant. It wasn't. You implied Werner had harrassed a person because of their gender. There's no other way to interpret that there.
- stephenr 8y ago> You were implying, with your statement, that her gender was relevant. It wasn't. No. You read intent where there was none. > There's no other way to interpret that there. Well clearly there is because it's not my comments getting down-voted to oblivion.
- Mononokay 8y agoMine certainly aren't; collective total of five up on them. I have to wonder what you feel the need to prove to the world.