4 ms·
Can confirm. The website is much faster and much nicer than it was a year ago. Also, I don't think GitLab has had a long downtime recently. At least not for an
by jazoom 8y ago
Can confirm. The website is much faster and much nicer than it was a year ago.
Also, I don't think GitLab has had a long downtime recently. At least not for any of my projects.
- Operyl 8y agoOh wow, it has been over a year since the GitLab database outage. That still feels like the other month to me. I'm getting old way too fast ...
- joshmanders 8y agoEven with the influx of users due to this I was able to not only setup a repo, but push all code up, and deploy via GitLab CI all within minutes... Speed is very good. I don't notice a difference between it and GitHub.
- Vinnl 8y ago> Also, I don't think GitLab has had a long downtime recently. That mostly depends on whether you're using CI/CD I'd think, that's had some day-long outages/problems lately. Of course, GitHub doesn't even have it's own CI/CD, and GitLab's is amazingly flexible, so it's still the better product. But it'd be nice if it were more stable. (Note: all this is on GitLab.com. If you self-host, it's presumably much better.)
- jazoom 8y agoI use GitLab.com's CI/CD extensively. I guess the downtime was when I was asleep or something because I've never seen a day-long outage.
- Vinnl 8y agoI don't encounter all of them myself - it depends on what I'm working on and perhaps also the timezone. That said, April 26th was the most recent occurrence for me where I was very happy I wasn't in the middle of a production deployment that I would have had to roll back. See the status updates on that day on https://twitter.com/GitLabStatus https://twitter.com/GitLabStatus (I am using the free tier though, so this is more informative than that I'm complaining.)