5 ms·
So you're saying if you buy a house, you will be making incredible gains. If not, then you will be making gains at least as good as everywhere else. Sounds like
by overeater 8y ago
So you're saying if you buy a house, you will be making incredible gains. If not, then you will be making gains at least as good as everywhere else. Sounds like win-win to me.
- lpolovets 8y agoThere are very few assets that return 10% annually for 20 years. It's impossible to know what will happen in the next 20 years, but owning a house in the Bay Area for the last few decades would have been a much better investment than paying a little less for rent and investing what's left over.
- fjsolwmv 8y ago6x in 20years is lower return than stock shares in most of the employers that have been driving up housing prices (for obvious reasons -- those companies' growth are funding the housing price gains)
- usaar333 8y agoNot sure why you are being downvoted, but this is correct. The returns on VITAX far outperformed leveraged housing. (see 3rd final thought at https://medium.com/@usaar33/why-you-shouldnt-buy-a-home-in-the-bay-area-right-now-9eff37da8d6 https://medium.com/@usaar33/why-you-shouldnt-buy-a-home-in-t...) Besides, 10% is about the long-term S&P 500 average return.
- hikarudo 8y agoNot to mention that by owning you have to pay property tax, which should be considered when comparing investment returns.
- jfnixon 8y agoIt is normally a Bad Idea to invest heavily in your employer due to the Putting All Your Eggs In One Basket principle. If anything happens, you lose your job and investments.
- 49bc 8y agoBut you can’t live in your other investments.