> afaik, conf-d is not in erlang though Most of the actual Configuration Database (CDB) is written in Erlang. Which also explains the statement made Cisco duri

> afaik, conf-d is not in erlang though Most of the actual Configuration Database (CDB) is written in Erlang. Which also explains the statement made Cisco during the conference. > what conf-d/tail-f brings to the table is the distributed nature of 2-phase commit to device configuration, as well representation of operational and runtime states of these devices. which has some appeal to it. Another thing that has quite some appeal, I think, is that by using a single YANG data model the daemon actually can synthesize the structures of the CLI, Web UI and NETCONF northbound API's. Again, biased because of Cisco employment.