3 ms·
I'm not reducing anything, that's exactly what people complains about. You don't seem to understand that the locals are the people complaining, not the drunkar
by narag 8y ago
I'm not reducing anything, that's exactly what people complains about.
You don't seem to understand that the locals are the people complaining, not the drunkards. The locals are people that are living there since forever and many of them can't choose to move.
The drinkers aren't locals. They very much care not to behave like that in their own neighborhoods so they go elsewhere to make noise.
- louthy 8y ago> You don't seem to understand that the locals are the people complaining, not the drunkards. The locals are people that are living there since forever and many of them can't choose to move. Can you provide evidence for your assertions? I see none of what you claim in the article. Are all locals complaining? Or a few of them? Have the locals really lived there forever? Where’s the proof? Ever lasting life aside, I suspect you’re exaggerating and the vast majority will have moved there within the past 20 years. And how do you know the drinkers aren’t locals? Have you met them? I note from your profile you’re not from the area, so how can you be so sure there aren’t any locals there? How local do you need to be to be allowed to stay up late and talk in any particular area? Should they live on the same square? Or, within a few streets? Should there be special police officers checking how local you are? But anyway, my comments were mostly about the general problem of conflict between day and night walkers, not just this specific incident.